Friday, January 22, 2016

Report about gasoline inventories

http://mam.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=471881&cust=mam&year=2016&lid=0&prev=/byweek.asp#top

EIA Petroleum Status Report 
Released On 1/21/2016 11:00:00 AM For wk1/15, 2016
PriorActual
Crude oil inventories (weekly change)0.2 M barrels4.0 M barrels
Gasoline (weekly change)8.4 M barrels4.6 M barrels
Distillates (weekly change)6.1 M barrels-1.0 M barrels
Highlights
Another very large build for gasoline leads another bloated petroleum inventory report. After swelling by 19 million barrels in the prior two weeks, gasoline inventories rose another 4.6 million and are officially classified as well above their upper limit. Oil inventories are near record highs, up 4.0 million barrels in the latest week. Distillate inventories, though dipping 1.0 million barrels, are still near their upper limit. And high inventories are coming at a time when demand indications are very low, down 2.8 percent year-on-year for gasoline and down a very steep 15.4 percent for distillates, the latter likely reflecting both warm temperatures and light industrial demand. Demand for oil is mixed in initial reaction to the report with WTI first swinging below $28.50 then bouncing toward $29.00.
Definition
The Energy Information Administration (EIA) provides weekly information on petroleum inventories in the U.S., whether produced here or abroad. The level of inventories helps determine prices for petroleum products.  Why Investors Care
 
[Chart]
As is evident from the chart, crude oil stocks can fluctuate dramatically over the year. When oil prices nearly reached $50 per barrel in August 2004, financial market players began to monitor crude oil inventories. It is not surprising to see sharp price hikes in crude oil when inventories are falling. Conversely, one would expect price declines when inventories are rising.
Data Source: Haver Analytics
 

Sunday, January 17, 2016

State of Russian Economy

http://www.focus-economics.com/countries/russia

Why oil could plunge to $20 a barrel, but probably not $10

Future prices matter for producers: http://www.marketwatch.com/story/why-oil-could-plunge-to-20-a-barrel-but-probably-not-10-2016-01-15

Why oil could plunge to $20 a barrel, but probably not $10

Published: Jan 15, 2016 9:47 a.m. ET
 

Many producers still pumping at under $30 a barrel

Getty Images
Oil futures dived back below $30 a barrel on Friday, but even that might not yet be enough to sufficiently choke off production and allow crude to put in a bottom, one economist calculated Friday.
That’s because a key question for oil traders is whether producers should emphasize current prices or those further in the future, wrote Julian Jessop, head of commodities research at Capital Economics, in a note.
After all, producers don’t just look a the spot price or the nearby futuresCLG6, -4.81% but are instead focusing on long-term contracts, including producer hedges, he noted. As a result, decisions on whether to invest in further production are dictated more by expectations for prices over the lifetime of a project rather than where they are right now.
Longer-dated Brent futures, he notes, show prices projected to rebound to around $50 a barrel by the end of the decade. Then there are production costs, which vary by producer, but also depend on whether the focus is on short-run operating costs or include long-run capital expenditures.
“In principle, firms will continue pumping oil as long as the selling price is above the short-run (or cash) cost. However, new investment will evaporate if prices are expected to be less than the long-run (break-even) cost,” Jessop wrote.
He points to the chart below, which offers a rough estimate of production costs. At around $30 a barrel, the current price of oil is still well above short-run production costs for major Middle East countries and the U.S., Jessop said.
And that is one major reason why it makes sense to brace for a further fall in price, he said. Capital Economics sees scope for oil to fall as low as $20 a barrel, but thinks calls for crude to drop below $10 goes too far. Although such a price would still be above Saudi Arabia’s production costs, “it would be impossible for Saudi Arabia to supply the whole world (even if it were willing to do so at such low prices given the country’s fiscal constraints),” Jessop said.
Capital Economics is forecasting oil to end 2016 at $45 a barrel, rising to $60 in 2017. A steeper near-term fall in oil prices is likely to lead to bigger supply cuts, which would allow for a stronger rebound in prices when it finally does arrive.
In other words, “if prices did keep falling in coming weeks, we might actually become more confident” in those price forecasts, Jessop said.

Fund manager who’s been right on oil has a depressing new prediction

http://www.marketwatch.com/story/fund-manager-whos-been-right-on-oil-has-a-depressing-new-prediction-2016-01-15

Opinion: Fund manager who’s been right on oil has a depressing new prediction

Published: Jan 16, 2016 10:43 a.m. ET
 

T. Rowe Price New Era’s Shawn Driscoll says the price for a barrel of oil could drop into the teens

Reuters
In November 2014, Shawn Driscoll, manager of the natural-resource-focused T. Rowe Price New Era Fund, told me he expected crude oil prices, then in the $80s-per-barrel range, to fall into the $50s within 10 years.
Ten weeks later, with crude in the $50s, I interviewed him again and he predicted crude would drop into the $30s.
This week, when oil was trading in the low $30s, I caught up with him once more. And if you’re looking for a so-called tradeable bottom in energy markets soon, you’re going to be disappointed.
Although Driscoll thinks crude oil will slip into the low- to mid-$20s within six months — at around $29.50 in late-Friday-afternoon NYMEX trading, we’re not far from that now — it ultimately could go lower as we spend the next decade digging out of a secular bear market in commodities and oil.
Why? Oil’s oversupply is profound and will last for at least two years, he said, and too many industry people still are in denial.
The oversupply, of course, stems from Saudi Arabia’s efforts to keep pumping to preserve market share from U.S. shale producers and other countries like Russia and Iran, which is chomping at the bit to free itself from international sanctions so it can pump oil again — at any price.
Commodities secular bear markets go on for years, fund manager Shawn Driscoll said — the last one took about 18 — and we’re only in the early stages of this one.
Given current demand — and without new Iranian production — “our model is saying we’re still oversupplied a million barrels a day in ’16,” said the manager of the $2.7 billion New Era mutual fund PRNEX, -2.31% “Our model for ’17 still shows oversupply with above-trend-line demand and without Iran.”
And the oversupply may be even worse than traders and investors acknowledge, because hundreds of thousands of barrels a day of new production are coming online in places like Brazil and Kazakhstan over the next couple of years.
“The piece that’s most overlooked by market participants … is the long-tailed projects, deepwater projects that take three to five years to come online. Those projects are still coming,” he told me. “There were decisions made in 2013 and 2014, the echo of those projects is still coming online this year and next year. 2018 is the first year you don’t see a lot of those projects coming.”
But despite massive production cutbacks, tens of billions of dollars in reduced investment and 250,000 layoffs and counting in the global energy industry, Driscoll sees, if not complacency, then a lack of fear among energy investors and decision makers.

============


Friday, January 15, 2016

Why clean energy is now expanding even when fossil fuels are cheap

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/energy-environment/wp/2016/01/14/why-clean-energy-is-now-expanding-even-when-fossil-fuels-are-cheap/

Why clean energy is now expanding even when fossil fuels are cheap

   
This story has been updated.
The latest evidence that 2015 was a breakout year for clean energy is in, and it’s particularly telling.
In a new analysis, Bloomberg New Energy Finance finds that 2015 was a record year for global investment in the clean energy space, with $ 329 billion invested in wind, solar panels, biomass plants and more around the world. (The number does not include investments in large hydroelectric facilities).
That’s 3 percent higher than the prior 2011 global investment record of $ 318 billion — and most striking is that it happened in a year in which key fossil fuels — oil, coal and natural gas — were quite cheap.
When it comes to fossil fuels, “prices have been low, continue to stay low, and yet we continue to see strong growth of wind and solar, and it speaks to the fact that again, these technologies are becoming more cost competitive,” says Ethan Zindler, an analyst with Bloomberg New Energy Finance.
As BNEF notes, the price of oil — which is burned to generate a fair amount of electricity around the world, though this is rare in the U.S. — tanked in 2015. Coal prices and U.S. natural gas prices also got considerably cheaper over the second half of 2014 and the 12 months of 2015. Nonetheless, China and the UK invested in massive multibillion-dollar offshore wind farms, even as other nations, from the U.S. to Brazil, saw near billion-dollar expenditures on new solar farms and biomass plants.
Fully one-third of the 2015 clean energy investment occurred in China — a punchline we’ve come to expect by now. That country saw investments of $ 110.5 billion last year. The United States was second with $ 56 billion.
Notably, India — perhaps the most watched energy nation in the world at the moment, due to expectations of major demand growth — invested $ 10.9 billion, a total that Bloomberg New Energy Finance calls “a far cry for the figures needed to implement the Modi government’s ambitious plans” in the clean energy space. India plans to install 175 gigawatts of clean energy generating capacity by 2022.
Measured in terms of electricity generating capacity, the world saw an additional 64 gigawatts of wind capacity added and 57 gigawatts of solar capacity, BNEF estimates. The most striking figure here is that while 2015 only saw about 4 percent more clean energy investment than 2014 (when $ 316 billion was invested), the growth in renewable energy generating capacity was much higher at 30 percent. This, again, signals declining cost, says Zindler.

Obama: U.S. must transition away from dirty energy

 
Play Video0:45
In his final State of the Union address, U.S. President Barack Obama said the U.S. must stop subsidizing fuels of the past. (Reuters)
“The technologies have reached an important tipping point in a number of markets in the world,” he says. “They are now, in a growing number of locations, becoming cost competitive.” It doesn’t hurt, of course, that government policy also favors them in many regions, a trend that will surely only continue in the wake of the late 2015 Paris climate agreement.
Overall, the addition of 121 gigawatts of solar and wind globally (also a record) means that roughly half of new electricity generating capacity installed last year was in these two technologies. In the U.S., solar appears to have seen a record year for installed capacity, at over 7 gigawatts.
From an industry perspective, too, the clean energy space seems to be thriving in lately. For instance, and as our own Joby Warrick reported recently, leading wind turbine maker Vestas saw its stock price double in 2015.
The solar business is also strong, says Tom Werner, the CEO of SunPower, which is one of the largest U.S. based solar companies with a recent market capitalization of $ 3.24 billion — and which is active in both the U.S. and China, where Werner says “we’re seeing very large projects.”
“We’re past the threshold point, now we’re to the point where it’s mainstream, and I think ’16 will be bigger than ’15, globally,” Werner says. He points to three recent developments to back that conclusion — the Paris climate agreement (which gives a market signal in favor of solar), the extension of solar investment tax credits in the U.S., and recent positive developments for solar net metering in California.
At the same time, clean energy jobs are also booming. The Solar Foundation recently released a report finding that the U.S. solar industry added some 35,000 jobs in 2015 alone, for nearly 209,000 overall now in the U.S. That total is expected to approach 240,000 by the end of this year.
Indeed, by all signs, 2016 will see more of the same in the clean energy arena. Already, it has held some pretty bad news for coal.
New York governor Andrew Cuomo announced, in his latest state of the state address Wednesday, plans to “eliminate all use of coal in New York State by 2020.” That came one day after President Obama, in his State of the Union speech, suggested plans to “change the way we manage our oil and coal resources so that they better reflect the costs they impose on taxpayers and our planet,” suggesting possible policy moves to limit coal leasing on public lands in the U.S.
Looking out still further, the International Energy Agency said last year that between now and 2020, renewable energy will be the largest area for growth, and predicts 700 gigawatts of added generating capacity.
In other words, while half of new generating capacity in 2015 was in the clean energy space, in coming years we may see that percentage grow even higher. Granted, there is still a ways to go before wind, solar, and other renewable energy sources are dominant in generating our electricity. Wind and solar provide about 5 percent of U.S. electricity right now, for instance. Here as across much of the world, electricity generation is still largely dominated by fossil fuels.
Adding it all up, the takeaway is that the race to switch off of fossil fuels — before too much carbon accumulates in the atmosphere and the planet warms by more than 2 degrees Celsius — is really starting to, um, heat up.

Economic news - CNNMoney.com