Thursday, September 26, 2013

Positives and Negatives of health care reform

http://www.kaiserhealthnews.org/stories/2009/august/11/health-industry-winners-and-losers.aspx

For Major Health Industry Players, Reform's Positives Outweigh Negatives

Aug 11, 2009
When Congress and the White House began talking about a health care overhaul, the industries that profit from the $2.5 trillion system were understandably nervous.

Graphic: Pluses and Minuses


But as the legislation takes shape, it appears much of the anxiety was misplaced. Most of the major health care players, including hospitals, health insurers and pharmaceutical companies, are likely to benefit – some handsomely – over the long term.

While hospitals and drug makers have made deals with President Barack Obama and the Senate Finance Committee to help finance the overhaul, in the end their profits could soar as more people have insurance coverage.

"Everyone has been nicked a little bit, but they are all flesh wounds," said Nancy Chockley, president of the National Institute for Health Care Management, a nonpartisan health policy research organization funded by Blue Cross and Blue Shield plans and government grants.

To be sure, lawmakers have yet to reach agreement on key issues that could have far-reaching effects on insurance companies and providers. They include proposals to set up a government-run health plan to compete with insurers and an independent commission to exert broad authority over Medicare spending.

And it isn't clear whether the highly publicized deals -- in which the industries agreed on savings to help pay for overhaul -- will hold.

But for now, "it appears the goal of the health overhaul is to expand coverage and contain costs, but without imposing too much pain on any one industry sector," said Jack Hoadley, a health policy analyst at Georgetown University.

Here's a scorecard showing where the various industries stand:

HOSPITALS

Worried they would have to pay too high a price for the overhaul, the hospitals were the first industry sector to make a deal with Obama and the Senate Finance Committee. Hospital groups agreed to give up $155 billion in Medicare funds over the next decade, or about an 8 percent cut. But the industry believes it will gain $170 billion by having to treat fewer uninsured patients.

"The hospitals did quite well for themselves," said Sheryl Skolnick, a hospital analyst with CRT Capital Group in Stamford, Conn.

But Skolnick and other experts note that health overhaul will affect individual hospitals differently. For instance, hospitals that treat greater numbers of uninsured -- generally urban and public hospitals -- will gain the most, while those most dependent on Medicare may face the biggest financial risks because of proposed cuts.

Pluses:
  • An individual insurance mandate and subsidies for low-income Americans to buy coverage will mean more paying patients for hospitals.
  • Hospitals were assured that cuts in Medicare and federal Disproportionate Share funding that compensates hospitals for treating the uninsured won't occur until insurance expansion is in place. And even then, about 60 percent of the funding will remain to help hospitals treat illegal immigrants and Medicaid recipients.
Minuses:
  • Loss of $155 billion in federal funding over a decade.
  • Obama and Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus, D-Mont., want to create an independent commission that would have broad powers over Medicare spending. The industry wants Congress to retain control over Medicare because the industry has more influence over lawmakers.
Mixed:
  • While hospitals oppose a government run health plan, they have won assurances from Obama and House committees that they will have the ability to negotiate the reimbursement rates above what Medicare pays . This is important because hospitals generally lose money on Medicare, which pays less than private insurers. Nonetheless, hospitals are still nervous about any plan to negotiate with the federal government.
  • Plans to expand Medicaid, the state-federal health program for the poor, will reduce the number of uninsured patients, but the program typically pays lower reimbursements than private insurers or Medicare.
HEALTH INSURERS
Health insurers have become the most vilified industry in the reform debate lately. That's partly because their profits and cost-control strategies make them an easy target, and partly because Democrats are nervous that support for the health overhaul is slipping in the polls and want to remind Americans about problems with the current health system.

Last spring, the insurance industry offered its own deal to policymakers: If the government would require all Americans to have insurance coverage, the insurers would agree to accept all applicants and not charge higher premiums because of a person's medical history.

But the industry has staunchly opposed a government-run public plan, saying it would lead to a government takeover of the health insurance field.

"The insurance industry won't be big gainers from reform if they are the whipping boy for all that is wrong in health care," Chockley said.

Pluses:
  • A proposed individual health insurance mandate has strong House and Senate support. The mandate along with subsidies to help low income Americans pay for coverage, could bring insurers tens of millions of new customers.
Minuses:
  • House Democrats and the administration are trying to eliminate bonus Medicare payments to Medicare Advantage plans, private health programs that cover one in five seniors.
  • The House committees’ bills require health insurers to spend a certain minimum percentage of their premium dollars on health costs, which the industry opposes.
  • The Senate Finance Committee is considering a tax on so-called "Cadillac" -- high-cost -- health plans. Insurers say the tax would get passed on to health plan customers.
Mixed:
  • Four of five congressional committees have approved a health overhaul with a public option. But the crucial Finance Committee package is likely to have instead a nonprofit cooperative that would function more like a public utility.
PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES

In a deal with the White House and the Senate Finance Committee, the drug industry has agreed to put up about $80 billion to help finance the expansion of health coverage. But the industry is likely to make that up by having more Americans insured so they can buy brand-name drugs.

In the deal, the drug industry pledged to sell brand-name drugs for half price to senior citizens when they hit the gap or "doughnut hole" in their Medicare Part D benefit. In the coverage gap, seniors have to pay the full cost of drugs on their own. The discount would start soon after the health overhaul bill is approved.

Another part of the $80 billion deal includes drugmakers paying higher rebates for medicines sold to individuals eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare. Drug industry rebates were reduced when the Medicare prescription drug benefit was established in 2003, but the overhaul bill would restore some.

In the deal, the pharmaceutical industry has won concessions from the White House that drug reimportation laws would not be changed to make it easier for Americans to buy less expensive drugs from abroad.

But it did not win any promises that would preclude congressional attempts to allow the government to negotiate lower drug prices under Medicare.

"If the price negotiation goes away, I think there is a real good chance the drug industry stands to gain from health reform," said Frank Palumbo, director of the Center on Drugs and Public Policy at the University of Maryland.

Pluses:
  • Expensive biologic drugs would get 12 years of exclusivity protection from cheaper competing medicines under the approved House bills and Senate proposals. Obama, the AARP and some lawmakers were calling for either a 5-year or 7-year limit. While biologic drugs are only a small portion of industry sales, they represent the fastest growing segment of the market.
  • More Americans with health insurance means more people will be able to buy medicines. The overhaul bills in the House would gradually close the Medicare "doughnut hole" by 2023, which would increase consumer demand.
Minuses:
  • The House Energy and Commerce overhaul bill calls for allowing the federal government to negotiate Medicare Part D prescription drug prices directly with drugmakers. Such negotiation has been prohibited by Congress . The industry would prefer to negotiate with the more than 250 Medicare drug plans because it has significantly more leverage with the plans than with the government.
DOCTORS

Pluses:
  • Congress plans to eliminate the current Medicare physician payment formula that each year threatens to cut doctor payments by nearly 20 percent unless Congress acts. The payment fix will give doctors an extra $230 billion over the next decade, according to the Congressional Budget Office. "Doctors are being given a pass in health reform," said Gail Wilensky, senior fellow at Project Hope.
Minuses:
  • No significant medical liability changes are in any of the overhaul bills.
Mixed:
  • Medicaid would be expanded in all the House bills. The amounts vary but could cover everyone in families with incomes as high as 150 percent of the federal poverty level, which is $33,075 for a family of four. While the expansion means more patients have insurance, Medicaid pays much lower rates compared to Medicare and private insurance.
  • The public plan option under the House bills would allow doctors to negotiate rates with the government that are above Medicare rates, but it is uncertain how much leverage doctors would have negotiating with the government.
  • Primary care doctors would probably benefit from the creation of an independent Medicare commission because the panel would be more likely to increase their fees and lower specialists' rates.
NURSING HOMES

Because most nursing home patients are covered by Medicare or Medicaid, reducing the number of uninsured doesn't really help the facilities. As a result, the industry doesn't see much gain in the overhaul.

Pluses:
  • The House Energy and Commerce Committee bill would establish a national long-term care insurance program. Beneficiaries would receive a daily cash benefit of about $50 to $75 — money they could use to pay for home care, adult day care, assisted living and nursing homes.
Minuses:
  • Nursing homes would see their Medicare reimbursements cut by 3 to 5 percent, or as much as $45 billion, over the next decade. While Medicare comprises only about 13 percent of nursing home revenue, the industry relies on the money to offset low Medicaid reimbursement.

Health Care reform

http://blogs.reuters.com/from-reuterscom/2010/03/19/projected-effects-of-passage-of-proposed-healthcare-reform-provisions/


Projected effects of passage of proposed healthcare reform provisions

By Reuters Staff
March 19, 2010
healthcare928

Are employers dumping health benefits because of Obamacare?

http://money.cnn.com/2013/09/26/news/economy/obamacare-employers/index.html

Are employers dumping health benefits because of Obamacare?

  @Luhby September 26, 2013: 6:07 AM ET
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

There are many assumptions about what the effects of Obamacare will be. This series aims to separate myths from realities and answer questions surrounding the Affordable Care Act.

Myth: Employers are dumping health benefits because of Obamacare.
Reality: It's true that Obamacare is raising costs on employers. And some are either passing those increased tabs to workers or are cutting back on benefits to keep costs under control.
Several employers -- including UPS (UPS, Fortune 500), Delta (DAL, Fortune 500) and University of Virginia -- have recently cited Obamacare as a source of increased costs. UPS and University of Virginia will no longer provide benefits for spouses with coverage options elsewhere. Trader Joe's and Home Depot (HD, Fortune 500)are shifting part-time workers to the Obamacare exchanges.
Some companies are making major changes that aren't directly related to Obamacare, but embrace the idea of health insurance exchanges. IBM (IBM, Fortune 500) and Time Warner (TWX, Fortune 500) are moving retirees to private exchanges, while Walgreens (WAG, Fortune 500) is shifting all its employees to a private exchange next year.
But Obamacare is not the only reason behind the benefits adjustments.
"An increase in costs of a few percent isn't enough to cause widespread changes in benefits," said Larry Levitt, senior vice president at the Kaiser Family Foundation.
Other factors, such as the improving economy, are contributing to rising costs since people use more medical care when the economy is healthier.
Also, companies have been shifting costs to employees for years. While UPS will limit its spousal coverage, it is not the first company to do so.

Tuesday, September 24, 2013

S&P Case-Shiller House Price Index

http://mam.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=456535&cust=mam&year=2013&lid=0&prev=/byweek.asp#top

S&P Case-Shiller HPI
Released On 9/24/2013 9:00:00 AM For Jul, 2013

PriorPrior RevisedConsensusConsensus RangeActual
20-city, SA - M/M0.9 %0.9 %0.8 %0.4 % to 1.0 %0.6 %
20-city, NSA - M/M2.2 %2.2 %2.0 %1.0 % to 2.1 %1.8 %
20-city, NSA - Yr/Yr12.1 %12.1 %12.4 %11.2 % to 12.8 %12.4 %
Highlights
Home-price appreciation is slowing on a monthly basis though is still growing on a year-on-year basis. S&P Case-Shiller's 20-city adjusted monthly index is up 0.6 percent in July, down from 0.9 percent gains in the prior two months and down from 1.7 and 1.9 percent gains in the two months before that. But the year-on-year adjusted rate, at plus 12.3 percent, is up 3 tenths for a new recovery high.

A look at monthly change among individual cities shows only scattered negative signs with many showing strong gains led by cities in the West. Year-on-year, growth rates in the West are in the 20 percent area led by Las Vegas at 27.5 percent.

Unadjusted data are followed closely in this report and tell the same story with the year-on-year rate at plus 12.4 percent for the 20-city index, also a recovery best. The unadjusted monthly gain in July, a month when buyer traffic is strong and sellers have pricing power, is at 1.8 percent but is down a bit from 2.2 percent in June.

Rising mortgage rates are likely pulling back demand and pricing power in the housing sector but, at least up to July, only to a limited degree. This is underscored by a strong FHFA house price index for July which was also released at 9:00 a.m. ET this morning.
Market Consensus before announcement
The S&P/Case-Shiller 20-city home price index (SA) was up 0.9 percent in the June report versus an average monthly gain of 1.4 percent from January to May. But the year-on-year adjusted gain, at a very sizable 12.0 percent, was just off its best level of the recovery which was May at plus 12.2 percent.
Definition
The S&P/Case-Shiller home price index tracks monthly changes in the value of residential real estate in 20 metropolitan regions across the U.S. The composite indexes and the regional indexes are seen by the markets as measuring changes in existing home prices and are based on single-family home re-sales. The key composite series tracked are for the expanded 20-city composite indexes. The original series (still available) covered 10 cities. A national index is published quarterly. The indexes are based on single-family dwellings with two or more sales transactions. Condominiums and co-ops are excluded as is new construction. The data are compiled for S&P by Fiserv, Inc. The S&P/Case-Shiller Home Price Indices are published monthly on the last Tuesday of each month at 9:00 AM ET. The latest data are reported with a two-month lag. For example data released in January 2008 were for November 2007.  Why Investors Care
 
[Chart]
The Case-Shiller Home Price Index is based on repeat transactions. That is, appreciation or depreciation is for same houses resold. This index is probably the best measure of changes in home prices. While it covers the gamut of types of houses sold, it is limited to metropolitan areas.
Data Source: Haver Analytics

Thursday, September 12, 2013

GDP Second quarter 2013



http://money.cnn.com/2013/08/29/news/economy/gdp-report/index.html

U.S. economic growth stronger than thought

  @hargreavesCNN August 29, 2013: 9:33 AM ET
chart gdp 082913
NEW YORK (CNNMoney)

The U.S. economy grew significantly faster than thought in the second quarter, which may help convince the Federal Reserve to start unwinding its stimulus program sooner rather than later.

The nation's gross domestic product -- the broadest measure of economic activity -- rose at a 2.5% annual rate from April through June, according to a revised estimate from the Bureau of Economic Analysis Thursday. That's higher than the 1.7% rate originally reported, and better than the 2.1% rate that economists surveyed by Briefing.com were expecting.
Rising exports, consumer spending and real estate spending helped boost the second quarter numbers. A decline in government spending acted as a drag.
The big upward revision was primarily the result of a better trade balance -- the nation exported more and imported less than previously thought, according to Paul Ashworth, chief US Economist at Capital Economics.
Related: How the Fed can taper without killing housing
All economic news is being closely watched for signs on when the Federal Reserve will begin curtailing its controversial bond-buying program. The stronger economic growth emboldens views that the Fed could start pulling back as soon as next month.
"The upward revision should give Fed officials more confidence that the recovery is gathering steam as the fiscal drag begins to fade," Ashworth wrote in a research note. "Under those circumstances, we still think the Fed will begin tapering its monthly asset purchases in September."
The Fed has been buying $85 billion a month in Treasuries and mortgage-backed securities in an effort to keep interest rates low and spur economic growth. Last May, Fed Chairman Ben Bernanke outlined a plan to begin "tapering" the purchases, and pegged the timing of that plan to improving economic data.
How I live on fast-food wages
Investors have taken that to mean as early as September, and have sent bond yields -- and mortgage rates -- soaring.
While 2.5% growth is decent, it's still below the 3.3% the economy has averaged since 1929. The August jobs report -- set for release next Friday -- will provide additional, and more current, data on the health of the U.S. economy.
The government revises its GDP figures several times after the initial release. This is the second estimate for second quarter GDP. To top of page 



http://mam.econoday.com/byshoweventfull.asp?fid=456059&cust=mam&year=2013&lid=0&prev=/byweek.asp#top


POWERED BY  econoday logo
Resource Center »  U.S. & Intl Recaps   |   Event Release Dates   |   Event Definitions   |   Today's Calendar

GDP
Released On 8/29/2013 8:30:00 AM For Q2:13

PriorConsensusConsensus RangeActual
Real GDP - Q/Q change - SAAR1.7 %2.2 %2.0 % to 2.5 %2.5 %
GDP price index - Q/Q change - SAAR0.7 %0.7 %0.7 % to 0.8 %0.8 %
Highlights
Real GDP growth for the second quarter was raised to an annualized rate of 2.5 percent compared to the initial estimate of 1.7 percent and compared to a fourth quarter rise of 0.1 percent. Expectations were for 2.2 percent.

Final sales of domestic product showed a revised gain of 1.9 percent versus the advance estimate of 1.3 percent. This series increased 0.2 percent in the first quarter. Final sales to domestic producers (which exclude net exports) was nudged down to 1.9 percent versus the initial estimate of 2.0 percent. This followed a 0.5 percent gain in the first quarter.

The upward revision to GDP growth was mainly due to a sharp upward revision to net exports. Also, there were improvements to inventories and nonresidential structures investment. Government purchases were modestly weaker. Other components were little changed.

Turning to comparisons to the first quarter, the increase in real GDP in the second quarter primarily reflected positive contributions from personal consumption expenditures, exports, private inventory investment, nonresidential fixed investment, and residential fixed investment that were partly offset by a negative contribution from federal government spending. Imports, which are a subtraction in the calculation of GDP, increased.

Headline inflation for the GDP price index was revised up to 0.8 percent compared to the advance estimate of 0.7 percent annualized inflation rate. When excluding food and energy, inflation for the second quarter was unrevised at 1.1 percent.

Overall, GDP growth for the second quarter was better than earlier believed. Compared to past recoveries, the latest growth rates are not inspiring but the upward revision may add to Fed debate to gradually start to taper asset purchases.
Market Consensus before announcement
GDP growth for the second quarter topped expectations but partly due to first quarter GDP being revised down with annual revisions. GDP gained an annualized 1.7 percent, following a 1.1 percent rise in the first quarter. The prior estimate for the first quarter was 1.8 percent. Analysts had projected a 1.1 percent advance for second quarter GDP. Demand was soft in the second quarter but even softer than earlier believed in the first quarter. Final sales of domestic product posted at a gain of 1.3 percent versus the second quarter rise of 0.2 percent. Final sales to domestic producers (which exclude net exports) increased 2.0 percent after nudging up 0.5 percent in the first quarter. Overall inflation slowed in the second quarter. Headline inflation for the GDP price index rose an annualized 0.7 percent after a 1.3 percent increase in the first quarter. When excluding food and energy, inflation eased to 1.1 percent in the second quarter from 1.6 percent the prior quarter.
Definition
Gross Domestic Product (GDP) is the broadest measure of aggregate economic activity and encompasses every sector of the economy.  Why Investors Care
 
[Chart]
Real GDP growth is always quoted at a quarterly annual rate. It measures how much the economy has grown over a three-month period. Quarterly growth rates are often volatile; consequently, economists also like to look at the year-over-year growth in GDP. The yearly changes tend to be more stable.
Data Source: Haver Analytics
 
[Chart]
It is common to compare quarterly changes at annual rates in the GDP deflator. These can be volatile, just like the quarterly swings in real GDP growth; as a result, the trend in inflation is better determined by year- over- year changes.
Data Source: Haver Analytics

 

Tuesday, September 10, 2013

College Student Enrollment

http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/education/cb13-153.html

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:  TUESDAY, SEPT. 3, 2013

After a Recent Upswing, College Enrollment Declines, Census Bureau Reports

According to U.S. Census Bureau statistics released today, college enrollment in fall 2012 plunged by half a million (467,000) from one year earlier. This decline, which includes both graduate and undergraduate enrollment, follows a period of substantial growth — 3.2 million — between 2006 and 2011.
school enrollment These statistics come from School Enrollment: 2012. As the nation's students begin a new school year, the Census Bureau releases its annual set of tables on the characteristics of children and adults enrolled in school at all levels — from nursery to graduate school. Among the characteristics examined are age, sex, race, Hispanic origin, nativity and foreign-born parentage.
This decline in college enrollment was driven by older students — that is, those 25 and older. Their enrollment fell by 419,000, while the enrollment of younger students declined by 48,000.
Hispanics didn't follow the trend, as the number enrolled in college grew by 447,000 from 2011 to 2012. Meanwhile, non-Hispanic white enrollment declined by 1.1 million and black enrollment by 108,000. From 2006 to 2012, the percentage of all college students who were Hispanic rose from 11 percent to 17 percent. The percentage who were black also rose (from 14 percent to 15 percent), but the percent of non-Hispanic white students declined from 67 percent to 58 percent.
"This increase in the number of Hispanics enrolled in college can be attributed to the combination of an increase in the adult Hispanic population and their climbing likelihood of being enrolled," said Julie Siebens, a statistician in the Census Bureau's Education and Social Stratification Branch.
The tables released today cover specific topics such as enrollment by grade, the attendance status of nursery school students and characteristics of their mothers, the type of school college students attend (two-year, four-year, etc.) and whether they attend full or part time, students taking vocational courses and the enrollment status of recent high school graduates. The information was collected in the October 2012 Current Population Survey.
Also released today was School Enrollment in the United States: 2011, a report that examines the characteristics of people enrolled in school at all levels using statistics from the Current Population Survey, American Community Survey and federal sources outside the Census Bureau. It covers some topics not typically covered in Census Bureau reports, such as Head Start, charter schools, home schooling and receipt of financial aid.
Although most of the statistics are national-level, some state-level data from the American Community Survey are presented. Updated 2012 American Community Survey statistics on school enrollment covering states and all geographic areas with populations of 65,000 or more will be published in September.
Other national highlights from the 2012 Current Population Survey tables:
  • In 2012, 78 million people, or 26.4 percent of the population 3 or older, were enrolled in school.
  • In 2012, there were 19.9 million college students, including 5.8 million enrolled in two-year colleges, 10.3 million in four-year colleges and 3.8 million in graduate school .
  • In 2012, there were 4.2 million students enrolled in private elementary and high schools (first through 12th grade), down from 4.8 million in 2005.
  • Non-Hispanic white children in 2012 comprised 53 percent of elementary school students, down from 58 percent in 2005. Hispanic children made up 24 percent of elementary students in 2012, up from 20 percent in 2005. Black children comprised 15 percent of elementary students in 2012, down from 16 percent in 2005.
  • Students who were born in another country or whose parents were foreign-born comprised 32 percent of all those enrolled in school at all levels in 2012.
  • While most students are under 25, there were 804,000 students age 50 and older enrolled in schools at all levels in 2012.

Economic news - CNNMoney.com